Lying Your Way Into War

Rate this:
By Dr. Fallon (Contact - View My Woyano)
Published Mon 12 Feb 2007, 374 Views, 6 Comments

Last week, on that hole-in-the-news-cycle they call Friday, the Pentagon released a report that admits -- finally -- that the intelligence they released was not the same as the intelligence that they had regarding the Pentagon's "justifications" (if lies can ever be called justifications) for invading Iraq.
The report said the team headed by Douglas Feith, under secretary of defense for policy, developed "alternative" assessments of intelligence on Iraq that contradicted the intelligence community and drew conclusions "that were not supported by the available intelligence."
The report says, in part (my emphases):
While such actions were not illegal or unauthorized, the actions were, in our opinion, inappropriate given that the products did not clearly show the variance with the consensus of the Intelligence Community and were, in some cases, shown as intelligence products.
In other words, the "products" were the opinion of Douglas Feith, the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, approved by Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, and passed off as "intelligence." In words even more direct, clear, and understandable, they lied to us.

Howie (and his ilk -- all 25% of them) still won't believe that there were no links between Iraq and al Qa'ida. Whatever the Bush administration says must be true.

But that's a problem. It is a problem because this entire affair -- the six year history of the Bush administration -- has weakened rather than strengthened the US Intelligence Community and our national security. As reported earlier here, here, here, here, and here, the CIA under the Bush administration is in danger of being emasculated, turned into an instrument of politics rather than objective intelligence gathering. The DoD Report does nothing to quell this fear. Feith's activities, with Rumsfeld's and Wolfowitz's knowledge and approval,
undercuts the Intelligence Community by indicating to the recipient of the briefing that there are "fundamental problems" with the way that the Intelligence Community was assessing information.
In other words, the objective truth didn't suit their desires: the invasion of Iraq. So alternative stories had do be manufactured. The US Intelligence community, in doing its job, wasn't doing the job the Bush administration wanted: justifying an invasion of Iraq. So it was time to make the CIA irrelevant.

It is time for us, the American people, to write an alternative ending to the Iraq war, and to the dismal accomplishments of the Bush administration: IMPEACHMENT.


This Item
Category: Blogs, Dr. Fallon
Tags: Bush, Feith, impeachment, PNAC, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz
Contributor
Dr. Fallon
Share it
Link to this item:
Bookmark this item: RSS Feed

People who liked this item

    6 Comments

  1.  
    Mentok ~ 22 months ago
    0 votes thumbs up thumbs down
    Interesting read thanks. Not suprising but still interesting.

    S.
    [ reply ]
    1.  
      Dr. Fallon ~ 22 months ago
      0 votes thumbs up thumbs down
      No, it shouldn't be surprising. We've known this since before the war, and anyone who knows anything about Islam and Ba'athism knew waaaayyyyy before the war that any sort of entente between Saddam and al Qa'ida was likely only in the realm of fantasy.

      Thanks for you comment.
      [ reply ]
      1.  
        jenniemeyer ~ 22 months ago
        0 votes thumbs up thumbs down
        We must be in the spin cycle again. Sometimes I really feel like we are in the wash with a lot of dirty laundry, and no matter how many times it's thrown in the wash machine, it just doesn't get clean! It even seems as if it gets dirtier after the spin cycle.

        Sigh. What can be said when they even talk about it like it is a "product", something that is manufactured, rather than researched. No, this stuff doesn't seem like it is coming from the intelligence community as much as it is coming from an imagination community.
        [ reply ]
        1.  
          Dr. Fallon ~ 22 months ago
          0 votes thumbs up thumbs down
          Disney "imagineers" at work? I wouldn't be at all surprised....
          [ reply ]
          1.  
            jenniemeyer ~ 22 months ago
            0 votes thumbs up thumbs down
            That's exactly what I was thinking! Imagineers in an evil parallel universe, or should I say evil DisneyWorld?!
            [ reply ]
            1.  
              Dr. Fallon ~ 22 months ago
              0 votes thumbs up thumbs down
              Isn't that the same thing?
              ;-)
              [ reply ]
              1.  
                22 votes thumbs up thumbs down
                This is my two cents...

                   
                Hey you know AdGuy always gets the last word! ;)

              Please Login to Add Your Comment   ..or..  

              Replying to comment by