This article references an external link -- click here to visit 
http://www.youtube.com/wa...NFJA&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/wa...NFJA&mode=related&search=
|
Nasa Moon Hoax II Videos - Animation of the New HoaxRate this:
 
Published Fri 20 Jul 2007,
1325 Views,
21 Comments
|
arooka
21 Comments
such nonsense that anyone ever went to the moon!
utter rubbish
http://www.woyano.com/vie...n-landing-and-get-violent
Unfortunatly, people could not enter into rational conversation about it, just lots of children scared that their belief structure would be torn away from them.
As for kennedy assassination, the Zapruder film clearly depicts the driver shooting a gun which ruptured kennedy's skull, thus killing him.
http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/jfk468.gif
The most convincing proof is the lunar lander take-off from the moon. Pieces of gold-plated astrafoil are torn off from the lander's discarded descent stage by the blast from the departing rocket motor. They streak away in almost straight lines because there is neither an atmosphere to slow them nor a heavy gravitational field to drag them down.
It was a model? NO. The containing vacuum tank would still have to have been hundreds of feet across and NOBODY had that technology!
It was a video simulation? NO. There was NO SUCH THING as video simulation software in those days; my 1980's twenty-buck calculator was MORE COMPLEX than NASA's onboard flight computer.
It would have been cheaper to go to the Moon to simulate that wonderful video clip, and that is of course what they did.
All you fools that think the Moon Landing was a hoax must have flunked in Science at school, and qualify yourself for the Darwin Award. I hope you win it.
my sentiment exactly - :)
if you think this post is a laugh, scroll back to arooka and smarttmans other eloquent comments hahaha
*S* i do enjoy a bit of a laugh at the right wing extremists expense :)
http://www.woyano.com/vie...---US-Government-Officals
Before you go around calling people Darwin (scientifically illiterate), you should ensure your science is upto snuff.
why don't you go away and read a book like? arokka
HOWEVER IN 1969 IT WAS DIFFERENT. Go away and read "The Illustrated History of NASA" by Robin Kerrod. Lots of pretty pictures and not too many hard words.
"pubic relations campain to shore up falling poplar support for jFKenedy" - What? Apart from the horrific spelling (all those falling trees! LOL) IF HE DIED IN 1963, WHY DID THEY BOTHER TO SUPPORT HIM IN 1969?
Oh God, I'm arguing with an eleven-year-old! Sorry smartttboy...
Cosmic radiation penetrated the astronauts second-by-second, but it does YOU as you read this. There is NO SUCH THING AS A SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION. Their TEN DAYS in space was about equivalent to TEN YEARS down here. Had they been on the Moon during a period of HIGH SOLAR ACTIVITY they would have risked a fatal dose of radiation. Even so it was a RISK, not a CERTAINTY. Cosmic activity is many powers of ten more energetic than solar, and the consequences of that can easily kill YOU down here.
And YOU haven't been to the Moon, whereas they have, and the proof is PLAINLY VISIBLE (to anyone with scientific understanding) in that lander take-off clip. All you are doing by your post is parading your ignorance...
And the Darwin Prize (Google it) is awarded to those who have removed their stupid genes from Humanity's gene pool by self-immolation through a failure to understand Science.
Wise up before you win it.
Back then recorded footage was so dodgy anyway who knows.
"Recorded footage" was completely adequate for the tasks required. Their million-dollar onboard landing computer was slower and less capable than my '80s $20 Casio calculator, BUT IT WORKED.
There are COMPLETE RECORDS; it just wasn't the VIDEO world of today. You would have to learn to read books....
lol i suppose this is a lie too
hehehe
The international space station sits in orbit around the earth at aprox. 200 miles (320 kilometers) from the surface of the earth. This is still within earth's atmosphere. (there is still air there). The distance between the earth and the moon is 384,400 km and the distance before gravitational forces are only one millionth of what they are on the surface (ie. .0000001 psi) is about 6.37 million kilometers from Earth (almost 17 times farther away than the Moon). In this sense, once you are over 6.37 million kilometers you begin to actually enter space. 200 km is still within the atmosphere and thus not actually in space. Only the americans, with their fake science consider space to start at 80km - for obvious reasons. If not obvious to you, it is because they can't actually get to space. Can't even leave the atmosphere, let alone land on a the lunar surface. (maybe land on the moon which travels through the earth's surface - yes earth has two moons!)
So is your news story, of astronaughts polluting our atmosphere a lie? Not at all. Are they in space? Not at all. Will you be able to understand? Possibly.
Save to point out that the international space station doesn't exactly "sit" in orbit.
It is travelling at 15,500 miles per hour, and ANY atmosphere around is SO THIN as to be virtually in Space.
Otherwise it would SOON be a DESCENDING FIREBALL. Which Columbia became by accident...
Those dead astronauts were brave hard-working people. YOU on the other hand...
-Virtually in Space, and space are different places.
(refer: "200 km is still within the atmosphere and thus not actually in space")
-I am not sure what your point is "soon decending into fireball".. in fact the space station is constantly being re-elevated so it does not fall back into earth, since being in the atmosphere gravity pulls or pushes it down (depending on your science bases).
-"Brave hard-working people" - you can make that claim for anyone, even the janitor which cleans up public washrooms, but I don't see you giving medals out to them.
Thanks for your insight, even though it lacks thought, a good attempt at proving your inital thesis.
and i for one appreciate just how silly :)
Hey you know AdGuy always gets the last word! ;)